I understand the moral issue with abortions and the balance between individual rights of the
parents and the supposed rights of the embryo or potential baby. The argument that human life
begins at conception is a slippery slope that causes some misunderstandings of what that
statement really means. To say that the potential life of the conception process is the deciding
factor of "human life" with rights of their own, causes some holes in logic. If it were the
case, then shouldn't every single drop of sperm that did not make it through the conception
process be considered also? Sure, it is inevitable and a worthy sacrifice for the true goal of
fertilization, but those cells all account for the "potential" value of the conception process.
Should we call sex immoral too because it kills sperm? (... the surprising thing is that sex is
immoral sometimes in religious communities, so nevermind.) Even examining the early blastocyst
or embryo, consciousness is not present nor is the development as complex as an embryo a month
or so later, so the cruelty of destroying them is not necessarily present unless it compromises
the mother's health. I understand that many view abortion as this cruel process of killing an
innocent being, but abortions if done with much preparation and early response (regulated more
strictly in order to remove abuse), then abortions can potentially save the life of the mother
and/or save the parents future if they are not ready to be parents for whatever reason. Why
bring in a child with misery and/or negativity? Birth should be approached as a joyous occasion
and with MUCH deep thinking and planning on the parent's behalf. I do realize that abortions are
always going to be difficult topics to think about especially for future parents but it is
incredibly important and abortion rights should be given in order to provide a second chance for
the parents whether its a health or social issue. The idea of killing anything human is
troubling, but if we put value in every living cell or group of cells to the point that it gets
in the way of a person's liberty and freedom, we must loosen up on that and approach the issue
medically and socially in terms of economic or personal reasons. It is true, abortions have been
abused with some women simply not using protection and continuously have unsafe sex, but
attention should be diverted from abortions to sex education and safety. Sex is a great thing,
but we should teach children what to expect and how to protect themselves and make them take on
a more responsible sex life. If there is more concentration on advocating sex education and
birth control, we can prevent awkward and potentially damaging situations as abortions. Having
an abortion does suck and is not a cakewalk, but it does save lives. Whatever is aborted is put
to good use. Morally, stem cells from these aborted fetuses or blastocysts can save millions of
lives with more research. That potential baby just became a savior for many others. I would
think that is almost beautiful. The idea is basically taking a bad situation and making it good
overall in the end.
I never thought I would vote again due to the severe degradation in our government, state and
federal, but hey along comes someone I believe is a straight shooter, no nonsense and the
like. Well there are some things I would like Mike to talk about, specifically our economy and
how we need to think about the petrol dollar and its synthetic and unsustainable profits.What
will we do?
Second I would like Mike to focus a bit more on Hispanic and Black issues and things such as
the AIDS epidemic in our country. How we can become a leader and beacon for freedom and
technology and at the same time become more considerate of our neighbors on this small planet.
The world is changing rapidly and people are starting to wake up and realize what they
thought was reality was just a trashy novel; its sad to say but thank god W came along to help
us see the reality that we have been lied to for so long. Thank god Mike came along to clean
house! Peace
I hope Gravel's campaign people are reading this. Right now is the absolute perfect time for
them to turn up the heat and push the Nat'l Initiative, in light of the past horrible revision
of the FISA court law that past this last weekend and all of the other hard efforts ignored by
congress, that the people who have protest and campaigned for Dems who told us that there
would be real change. This is the only thing that will save this country is by giving the
power to the people to make laws for themselves and reduce congresses role to administrative.
I hope his people jump on this opportunity.
Also on the Fair Tax, Gravel needs to point out a couple of things to make this issue
clearer. One that the rebate he is proposing is a way to offset the tax liability of the 23%
or what ever rate that would be used. Equal to in the income tax system the way a standard or
items deductions offset tax liability that way, only the rebate checks come monthly to the tax
payer since there would be no tax forms to submit.
Second Gravel should point out that there are 5 states that have a version of this in place
where there is no state income tax, but a higher sales tax instead to raise revenue. Wash
& NV are two that I can think of off the top of my head.
you and dennis kucinich seem to be the peace candidates. and way to the left. i am a leftie
and i think we need a change to the left. what if the two of you ran together?
remember, bill clinton was the come back kid. you and dennis could be the new come back kids.
you ned more time on those debates.
good luck. hang in there. if tucker carlson doesn't like your views...you are doing something
right. needless to say tucker does not think much of any liberals. i would love to see you
face off on his show. you could really give it to him!
I agree, I was actually thinking the same thing. I think Gravel would fare better in the
general election. So if Kucinich would step out of the primary race, with a public pledge by
Gravel to pick him up on his ticket as VP. Gravel would witness a sharp rise in polls, which
in turn would encourage more people to support him. Cause I believe there are alot of people
out there that want to vote for Gravel, but they wont because they're stuck in this
"top-tier/bottom-tier" mindset. If people had more confidence that he could win the race,
they would flock behind him in the millions.
The Gravel, Kucinich camps should really be discussing this!
To Matt and Jaywen - Thanks so much for your ideas and comments as I normally shy away from
political involvement and try to look at things with a spiritual principle or virtue (Justice,
love, kindness, etc.) that can be applied for a given situation - not trying to appear any
better than anyone else but looking for alternative solutions. Regarding some of your thoughts
and suggestions - the idea about the women's right is kind of what I'm getting at in regards to
moral judgements - I do think life begins at conception. It's kind of like a seed potentially
becomes a tree for example - the human embryo is growing all along - it may look like something
other than human but its potential is there. The life style issue - hedonism means pleasure
seeking. Yes I agree we all have a right to be happy but at the expense of life is again the
moral question - it may be inconvenient to parent or as with the war issues - the difficulties
and the pain that war causes - people sacrifice for others - in general we need to look at
better ways to resolve and solve problems that people deal with. I look at humanity like the
different organs in the body - when one part doesn't fuction right the whole body suffers and
doesn't work well. Moral behaviour issues is like one of those parts that make up the whole. We
may not know what happens in private but I believe it still has an effect - kind of like the Law
of Gravity - we may not see it or believe it - but if we go over the edge of a ten story
building we'll feel the result on our way to the bottom. It's my hope that we'll work together
in the spirit our common humanity to make life better for all. Kind Regards, Brad
As I see it, perhaps the best way to deal with the abortion issue is to examine the
correlates of abortion and then target those correlations with effective
policies. If those correlations can be dealt with effectively, then perhaps less women will
even see abortion as a personal option. From what I've read, there are at least three
significant correlations that can be made with women who get abortions:
1.) Women who tend to be young
2.) Women who tend to lack financial resources
3.) Women who tend to lack social support
If these three points are accurate, then focusing on these areas may be more productive on
this issue.
Please excuse me for possibly sounding a bit rightous here but I've been doing some thinking and
I know Mike has some clear ideas about Iraq and the morality of war and nukes, etc. (Candidates
that voted for war not having good moral judgement to be leaders). I do appreciate the words
that Mike speaks and I love the guy and his ability to reason through the big picture, but I now
have to take issue with his willingness to go along with abortion...if the women so wants an
abortion. It also grieves me that homosexuality is so easy for Mike to go along with - I
appreciate his unlimited liberal and non judgemental and freedom stand, but for me I find it a
contradiction or a redefining of the word morality. I feel the world today has gone too far with
individual freedom issues - one could say an almost hedonistic way of life is being accepted.
So, where does the idea of good or sound moral judgement begin and end Mike? We all have choices
to make in life and moral judgements have to be made in many areas of our lives - some one life
at a time. Best Regards, Brad
Why is abortion an issue that is difficult to grasp? I actually do understand why some
pro-life people (I think both terms for the sides of the argument are bogus-it should just
be for or against abortion-I'm pro-life and choice.) think the way they do, but I think it's
misguided. Then again, I wouldn't really want to have a child I helped conceive be
aborted-but I also understand it isn't my place-it's the woman's place, it is her body, and
I don't believe that the embryo or fetus counts as sentient human being until it has a
developed brain and nervous system-for until then it can not think or feel. And even when it
does, I believe the woman's life, with a great deal of people who love and care for her, is
more important-considering there is no suffering for the fetus. But, regardless of any of
this-it is the woman's body and her choice to do as she chooses with it, as she is the
adult, sentient human being without question-and the zygote is not the same as an infant
child.
What gives the government the right to legislate morality? Homosexuality is a
private matter that effects no one else and, as Gravel would agree with me on, falls under
the right to the pursuit of happiness in the very documents this country was founded on. The
abortion argument may hold some debate, but I don't see it with homosexuality-morally wrong
or not, it hurts no one. Many people see religions opposed to their own (or the lack of a
religion) as evil-but most would also see it as preposterous to suggest that the government
stop people from practicing a religion or not practicing a religion in a country that is
supposed to have freedom.
My view of morality, and I think Gravel's view is similar which is part of why I support
the man, is that it is only truly wrong if it hurts someone other than the perpetrator of
the act. If there is no victim, there should be no crime, so to speak. Moral judgment on the
political level should be decided on grounds regarding personal liberties and the well being
of the people-not what the decision maker views as wrong and right in a private situation.
And to address your comment on a hedonistic way of life being accepted-why not? I'm not a
hedonist myself-but why should someone who contributes to society otherwise not be allowed
to live their life as they choose? I don't think hedonism falls in with either of the other
"moral questions" (for lack of a better term), but it is a point nonetheless.
Don't mean to sound preachy or argumentative myself-just expressing ideas.
-Matt
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -
Gandhi
Important points you've made. "Morality" is certainly an important topic. It should be a part
of our public discourse on both sides of the political spectrum, (actually, I think "ethics",
along with philosophy in general, should be part of our school curriculum). However, I think
it's inapprpriate to think that so-called "conservatives" have a monopoly on the subject,
(though I'm not suggesting that this is your position). Humans certainly have "freedom,"
(i.e., the capacity to make choices). However, what makes humans uniquely "moral agents" is
that we have the unique ability to reflect upon the "intentions" of our actions and the
"consequences" of our actions *towards others*. Actually, I would argue that simply accepting
"traditional values" without question and personal analysis is itself immoral, because moral
judgements by one individual or group can have *consequences towards others*. Though I'm not
suggesting this is what you're doing, (you seem to be quite thoughtful), I think,
unfortunately, this is what a lot of people do. ------
I don't think homosexuality is immoral or hedonistic. It is simply **part** of one's identity
that it seems some people are born with. (If my understanding of the research is correct,
pre-natal conditions seem to play a significant role). In terms of abortion, I'm pro-choice,
but I appreciate the pro-life position. If you believe that human life begins with conception,
then there is certainly an ethical dilemma. However, I personally don't accept that human life
begins with conception. On the contrary, I would suggest that defining human life as a
microscopic set of chromosones and cells is itself *dehumanizing*. Certainly, there is more to
human life than that.
Just some thoughts...
Recently heard Sen. Gravel on Air America. Interviewer spent way too much time
covering his support of gay rights. If he wants to get anywhere right now I think this should
be downplayed. Republicans are dismantling and bankrupting America, and most of the current
administration and their supporters and operatives like Rove should be heading to jail - and
we're talking gay rights? Democrats should stay on mainstream issues and hammer Republicans
on Iraq, security, fraud, disappearing billions, the environment, the economy, cronyism, the
disappearing Constitution, banking laws, foreign trade, geez the list is endless. The
relatively small amount of media coverage he gets should not be wasted on fringe issues. If
Gravel makes it to a faceoff with Republicans they're going to have a ready supply of gay
rights-type marriage issues etc to whack-and-slime him (or any other Democrat). If Democrats
want to portray themselves as progressive during a campaign that's great, but they will not
make it to the whitehouse where they will actually make a difference on these issues. Reach
too soon for fringe issues and we're going to get another fascist in the whitehouse.
Submitted on August 31st, 2007 by kabbalistguy1984
Well, Mike is a full supporter of same-sex marriage and the transgender community. Everybody
is going to eat that up. Yes, there are priorities before same-sex marriage (read Mike's
issues), but it's still an issue at hand in the American society.
Mike Gravel supporters can get together at Campaigns Wikia to add and exchange information
& ideas about the Gravel 2008 campaign. Editting is easy and ANYONE can use it! (This wiki
uses the same software as Wikipedia, but it is not affiliated with Wikipedia)
Mike Gravel article: (Something you'd like to add? Go for it!)
I recently saw online an ABC News interview with Senator Gravel and I was immediately moved.
After it was over I thought to myself "I have just found my presidential candidate". I then
found his web site so I could read more about where he stands, only to find he is pro-amnesty
for illegal aliens... I was crestfallen. I wrote to Senator Gravel and explained that, as a
lifelong Democrat, I have actually been having the unimaginable thought of possibly voting for
a Republican candidate based on this issue.
If only Senator Gravel would change his position and support American citizens and legal
residents instead of aiding border jumpers, I would contribute to his campaign and vote for
him in a heartbeat. Is it possible for his supporters to urge him to change his position on
this important issue and instead support American citizens rather than so many millions of
people who have illegally invaded our country? That would make all the difference for me. He
is a very powerful figure whose thinking is right on in so many other ways. I hope this
message gets through to him.
Are you afraid of losing your job or perhaps your afraid of "brown" people? Well if its the
job issue you need not look any further for blame than your betters and Nafta among other
things. And I would like to remind some about the campaign of fear Most politicians use to
collect votes. The Mexicans are feeling the global effects of stupid economic policies and
crooked politicians and this should be a gauge for the world as a whole and not as
mechanisms of fear. America is also feeling the squeeze and so what do we do? Well lets get
out torches and rope and look for a scapegoat! Mexicans? Sure!
Seriously though, I know there is a lot of"illegals" coming in but you cannot live in a
walled society.Look at any walls in the past. And besides they are not the cause for your
insecurities they are just an effect from a bigger cause.
Elites are bleeding us to death and we blame hard working people. Sad.
The center point of this issue I believe to be a simple one just as Gravel does. It is the
TRADE policies set up through NAFTA and have forced many Mexicans here to feed there families.
I think Mike is absolutly right in thinking a change in the trade policy along with diplomatic
pressure on the Mexican Government to take care of their people. Building a fence will only
cause more hate and resentment for the mexican population. Also when Gravel passes the drug
reform this will stop a large flow of POT and other drugs from being smuggled into the
counrty. The master of Gravel's plan is that the whole package works together to combat other
issues and to me that shows his true genius.
If you support a candidate based on one issue, you're likely to put someone in office who
will do many things you don't like, but will possibly give you one thing in return. Is that
worth it? There are a number of areas where I disagree with Mike, but looking at his record
at large (the war in Iraq, the Fair Tax, National Ballot Initiatives, legalizing marijuana,
stem cell research, gay marriage) I'm heavily leaning toward him.
The only way you'll find a candidate to support every issue the same way you do is if you
run for office. Barring that, look at each candidate and see who agrees with you on most
issues. That's your best candidate.
As far as writing to ask him to change his position, I'm 100% in favor of allowing people
into this country to find a better life. That's how my family wound up here. My
great-grandfather emigrated from Ireland, and from what I've been able to find out about
him, it looks like he came first to Canada and then into this country, and I can't find one
shred of evidence that he was legal. In fact, a great many people who are ancestors of
Americans did not enter this country legally. I can't deny anyone the right to want a
better life, just as my great-grandfather did.
I'm amazed that a nation that calls itself Christian would violate one of Jesus' teachings
in this matter. Any Christian who feels that we shouldn't extend legalization to these
people should spend some quality time with their Bibles, as they've missed some very
important teachings.
I think the only people who have a right to deny access to others into this country are
native Americans. Those who are the direct descendants of the people who lived here before
the Europeans came. Everyone else came here for the same reasons that people continue to
come here, and those people should be extended the same rights that we now enjoy because our
ancestors did the same thing.
Submitted on August 30th, 2007 by kabbalistguy1984
If you must support a candidate, it shouldn't be because of one exclusive thing. At the
same time, you will not find a candidate who will 100% satisfy you. Look over the agenda
of a potential candidate that you'll support and if you like him/her, then support that
person.
Also, this country is not Christian. We like to think we are, but we're not.
Submitted on July 19th, 2007 by Independent_Thinker
>"I think the only people who have a right to deny access to others
into this country are Native Americans. Those who are the direct descendants of the
people who lived here before the Europeans came."<
I know they feel the same way, but the US government is still holding them
hostage in many ways. But, that's a subject for another forum in another place and time.
Nonetheless, if you knew what I do about
the subject you would see what I mean. ;)
HOWEVER, back on topic, I believe that the term
"Illegal Immigration" is an oxymoron. A person who is here
illegally is an 'illegal ALIEN'. An
Immigrant is a person who has Immigrated here
LEGALLY!!!
I believe that it's fine if someone wants to Immigate here
LEGALLY!!! I believe Illegal Aliens should either be
sent back to where they came from (and the bill paid by their governments) and made to
Immigrate LEGALLY if they want to be here so bad
- OR - if a particular individual situation warrants it, they be
allowed Asylum until they DO get
LEGAL ....QUICKLY!!! But there had darned well
be an exceedingly GOOD REASON for the granting of Asylum!!!!!
I guess you have a selective memory of what Ellis Island was all about OR
you simply weren't taught about it in History Class. Learn about it here: http://library.thinkquest.org/20619/Eihist.html
"But, that's a subject for another forum in another place and time."
That forum is Prez on the Rez: "a historic forum that will
assemble Democratic presidential candidates together on Indian land for the first time
in American Indian history."
August 23, 2007.
Clinton has refused to show up. Obama and Edwards haven't agreed to be
there either. That leaves only the real candidates, the ones with serious ideas. Its
about time they pared these forums down to the serious candidates, they're just
trivializing it....
This morning, I watched Senator Gravel in the interview with George Stephanopolis. I am
impressed to find someone who thinks like I do. I live in a State where the majority is
still Republican even though some places are strongly Democratic. I would love to see a woman
or a black person as President, but I cannot agree with what they are expousing. This country
is in deep trouble on all fronts and we are not making changes. Senator Gravel was a breath
of fresh air. What do millions of dollars have to do with governing a country? These are our
millions of dollars going for ads that mean nothing. When did it start to matter how rich you
were instead of how intelligent and committed to this country and the rest of the world you
were? It should not matter. Each adult citizen of this country should have a vote, exercise
that vote and directly elect our leaders, maybe then, our leaders would have to respond to the
will of the people.
Submitted on July 19th, 2007 by Independent_Thinker
>"Each adult citizen of this country should have a vote, exercise that vote and
directly elect our leaders, maybe then, our leaders would have to
respond to the will of the people."<
Key words there that I Bolded and Underlined. The Electoral College is obsolete. It served
it's function in a time when it was needed. But, today, it only serves as a way to get
around the DIRECT ELECTION OF OUR LEADERS by US - We The People.
The Monkey's Garden, Manifesto
"tm"
http://home.comcast.net/~themonkeysgarden/TheMonkeysGardenManifesto.html
Current Issue: http://home.comcast.net/~themonkeysgarden/TMGMJuly2007.PDF
The restoration
of America
requires that we are provided with real leaders who believe in the buttressing
principles of our constitutional democracy.Mike Gravel (D) has my vote and complete support in his bid for the U.S.
Presidency in 2008.The mainstream media
continues to work against Mike Gravel, because they know he cannot be
bought-off and will re-empower the people as the government of the United States of
America.Mike Gravel and America require our assistance as
citizens and human brothers and sisters.Please visit Mike Gravel for President 2008 (www.gravel2008.us), read
the content, sign the petition to have Mike Gravel’s name listed on your
state’s ballot, volunteer, and donate whatever you can afford.Mike Gravel is
the only Democratic Party
candidate who truly offers us the kind of change that recognizes the human
being in all people.
Americans should
take their messages to the streets, even if that means standing alone for an
hour with your homemade sign and/or talking with other human beings about the
crimes of this treasonous administration.
Vote out of
office any politician who refuses to affirm the impeachment or indictment of
the continuing criminal enterprise that I have identified as the Bush bin Laden
Crime Syndicate; complicit coconspirators in the terrorist attacks against the
United States of America on 911.
Ask the other
candidates seeking the presidency in 2008, if they support publicly funded
elections and the elimination of corporatist contamination.
Please feel free to contact me with any
questions or if I may be of some service to you.
The freedom of speech and the press are so important in society. I feel sad about the many
things that people do for love of power, etc. - we do see that there are some people who take
the risks to speak up for justice and work for peace. Dr. Robert Anderson in New Zealand is one
of those that's not afraid to speak and write about how the USA, UK and others have been using
Depleted Uranium weapons over in Iraq and in other places for the last decade and nearly two. In
an article He quotes, Dr. Doug Rokke, an ex-director of the Pentagon's DU project, saying, "We
must do what is right for the citizens of the world - ban DU." By using these weapons the health
of civilians as well as the military people in the Middle East is under threat with long term
health issues for many generations to come. Please have a read from the following site in which
Dr. Anderson writes at some length about DU.
http://radio.weblogs.com/0128644/2006/07/index.html - May we all have the courage that some of
these people have to bring up this and other issues that are break from Geneva and UN
Conventions and is also a Human Rights issue. I'm remember the quote in a speech that Robert
Kennedy made 1968 in which he said ... "as Tacitus said of Rome," - "They made a desert , and
called it peace." Best Regards, Brad
Congratulations on having the courage to take the "un-Democratic" position of suggesting a
sales tax to replace the income tax. We Democrats should realize that the nation wastes too
much time and money on income tax collection and avoidance and we let millionaires regularly
off the hook because of tax shelters and smart attorneys that the average person does not have
access to.
The national sales tax can be made no more regressive than income taxes. In Calif. we exempt
many items (all food) from sales taxes. Congress could spend their time "fine-tuning" what
the sales tax applies to from year to year according to needs of the economy instead of
sitting around passing unecessary legislation. The downside is all of the tax people and
lawyers who will have to find another line of work.
An income tax is a tax on productivity. It just doesn't make sense. If you are not going to
spend money, that's your option and a tax shouldn't be collected until somebody does spend it.
Probably a bit old, but I just saw an interview where David Schuster had Mike on to talk
about the "rock" video. I thought I liked Schuster, at least a bit, but my god, the
condecension in his voice was terrible! He says "oh, so it took you THREE takes to throw a
rock into a lake? You're a nice man, but . . ." I mean, what kind of question is that? This
angers me in a lot of ways. A former senator, filibustered against the draft, instrumental in
the pentagon papers, what exactly are Shuster's accomplishments? It doesn't mean that Shuster
has to cowtow or anything, but a little decency or intelligent discourse please? "I hope your
next video will be about Iraq." ?!?!? There doesn't even seem to be a modicum of respect or
evenhandedness left among the "talking heads" or main "news" programs.
1. How much money was received in 2005 & 2006, from asset seizures in drug related crime
arrests in the United States ?
2. Why is media allowed to market depression and other illnesses to advertise legal drugs on
national television. i.e. commercials that sell anti depressants and other drugs therefore
encouraging the public to resort to drugs as a false sense of well-being?
3. What procedure took place to outlaw the television media from advertising the sale of
tobacco sales?
4. Can we implement these procedures to outlaw the advertisement of Alcohol and other legal
drug sales on national television?
5. What is the difference between legal and illegal drug sales?
6. What is the difference between legal and illegal drug use?
7. Why is it that when a towns economy gets very poor, the drug stores flourish?
8. Why is it that when a towns economy gets very poor, the drug related crimes escalate?
9. If everyone stopped illegal drug use, smoking and drinking alcohol and resorted to natural
health care tomorrow, what would that do to our governments economy?
10. How much does our system rely on drug addicts and people staying sick?
11. Why are there so many strict laws that limit the practice of natural health care?
12. Did you know that, based on Alcoholics Anonymous World Services' own statistics,
Alcoholics Anonymous has only a 5% retention rate and therefore is at a 95% failure? Given
these facts why is the government funding programs based on the 12 steps?
ive never been involved with politics much and it is not my area of interest. i like
chemistry and physical sciences but it just seems like those who go into politics as a career
are slowly ruining the country. supporting Mike Gravel seems like it could possibly be the
most important thing i can do, ever for the future of the country.
All i want is the truth, why is it so hard to find?
Submitted by georgesearlegiffin on Tue, 2007-06-12 15:22. *new
Thinking Americans have HAD IT with U.S. Media !! It is time
for a major joint
press conference or joint-resourced media time purchase
which would bring some of our best minds together in a panel to demand an abrupt alteration
of "media campaign coverage as usual". Picture these folks on one
stage: Mike
Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, Bill Moyers, Ralph Nader and Noam
Chomsky !! Maybe this should include a call for
massively boycotting major media news outlets that self-appoint themselves to "tier" and
"filter" who gets air time.
Demands: a) bury all use of "TIER" when refering to
candidates. All this does is
signal which ones are bought by big money. b) Remove
debates from control of Political Parties and from Media. We could return to League of
Women Voters, or some group who fundamentally UNDERSTANDS the priority of fairness for ALL U.S. Primary & Presidential Debates; c). pull licenses
of any network which claims news credentials, yet regularly excludes and "filters-out"
legitimate candidates who have profound messages and
skills. While we're at this business of reforming U.S. Media, how about if we finally get
down to demanding inclusion of more than two political parties. There is no precedent in
U.S. documents which picks this magic number, We need to end the two-party monopoly on the
debate and governing process. Actually, it's not so bad to
know which candidates are "bought", but the "tier"
process ends up being
a bazaar and totally improper "marker" to include or
exclude candidates from
how can we possibly tackle this issue. the only way average people catch on to issues is
when it gets pounded out in the media and they sure as hell arent going to cover anything
like this.
I'm working for Mike because I'm working for the best for my family, my country and my world.
It is critically important that we each take "ownership" of ourselves, our citizenship, and our
world family. I've just make my first contribution. I will be making more as this campaign
goes forward. I'm volunteering to work for Mike in Arizona.
Take up your ownership and get on board. It is time to get the USA train out of the ditch
- rerailerd -back on track and moving forward.
What a concept!! A candidate that actually thinks like most Americans and has the courage to
say so. I have always considered myself a conservative democrat. I want common sense laws
and leglislation. I feel that Mike Gravel offers this. I just sent a donation to his
campaign. It wasn't much because my husband's job is ending in September. It is being
shipped to Mexico. Come on folks if I can find the money to contribute so can everyone who
agrees with him. Just think. if everyone sent the money that they would spend for taking
their family to the movies one time amd donate it to his campaign it would give him a chance
to level the playing field with Clinton and Obama.
Thanks, Senator Gravel for your wonderful, brave stance in last night's debate. Your candor,
thoughtful comments and honesty certainly places you head and shoulders above all of the other
candidates.
It's good to see that you haven't faded away, and that you are still fighting the good
fight.
I've never forgotten the days when you would frequently visit the Malone Surveying office in
Kenai, and the issues of the day were hotly debated by you, my brother, and father. l admired
your stance on the Vietnam War.
Both my dad and brother are gone, but what they taught me endures. I'm hoping that for a
change, someone with real ideas, real ideals, and real courage can make a difference.
I know that it's difficult to compete with political strumpets who can raise a half-million
dollars at a sit-down dinner and can buy all the TV time the want, but I'm glad you're giving
it a shot. I've sent a small contribution to assist.
Welcome back. If nothing else, you can help keep the bastards honest.
Sir,
I am a U.S. Government Bodyguard, currently serving in Iraq. I see more than most, what is
actually going on here. Thank you for having the GUTS to speak the truth, and for doing so with
a level of clarity that is "Gravely" lacking in the other candidates. Based on what I've seen,
You Sir, have my vote. I know that you don't have the financial "backing" that the other
candidates have, but I will continue to support you as much as I can vocally, actively, and
financially. Thank You, Sir. Eli
I am overseas (not in the military) and will be returning home soon. I watched in despair
during the last election as all Democratic candidates refused to take a position on anything
and I questioned if my vote would even be counted. It was in this context that I was taken
completely by surprise by Barack Obama's keynote address in 2004. My eyes pricked with tears
and goosebumps made my hair stand on end as I began to believe that there was hope for change
in this country.
But hope does not make change and the time has passed for pretty words. It
is with someone who is willing to act that makes change. Senator Gravel's contribution to the
debate yesterday (thankfully available online) is evidence that he is willing to speak without
rehearsal and rhetoric because he has a plan of action. He didn't need to speak about his
upbringing, invent a young child's story to draw upon for sympathy, gloss over difficult
questions with measured fence sitting or minimize the impact of his past public work. He
helped the country to end the Vietnam years and I'm confident he will act again to end this
war. His tax plan, history of action for the environment and willingness to change the all too
sacred Constitution will help save the country. To all those naysayers who would dismiss him
because he doesn't have the "finesse" for foreign diplomacy - The world will be thankful to
voters if the US has TRANSPARENT, CONSISTENT and CLEAR policy.
Thank you so much Senator Gravel! Tell it to 'em straight - everyone deserves it!
First off, I'm a Clarkie so I'm heavy on veteran affairs. Mike Gravel made me take notice.
Good luck to him. We need more Americans like him to speak out.
Submitted on April 24th, 2007 by georgesearlegiffin
An important word on tax reform. Every American needs to see, and every
candidate needs to address the highly-organized documentation about the U.S. Income Tax
fraud in Aaron Russo's excellent film entitled" "America - Freedom To Fascism". You can
access it via Google, and via: www.freedomtofascism.com
Any candidate for president who is serious about tax reform needs to press for
a full shut down of an illegal IRS, and an illegal Federal Reserve Sytem.
See the above mentioned movie, then respond?
Just before the American Revolution, Americans had just "had it" with taxes
that totaled 10% of their income. Now illegal burden has risen to 30,40 & 50% of our
incomes. It's time for FULL REFORM.
Mike Gravel recently stopped by Vermont to hold a forum in Brattleboro. The telephone number
in the paper turned out to be where Sen. Gravel was staying...to make a long story short, I
was granted an interview for our local public access station. This interview turned out to be
the first in a series of shows that I will be airing called "Corporate Free Media". I will
also be trying to distribute this to other public access stations to air. I've chopped the
interview into segments for uploading to youtube. While I'm a rookie at this, I think Mr.
Gravel looks and sounds terrific. I'll have more segments to add later, I have two up so far,
but my regular job of running heavy equipment for a highway dept. takes up much time. To view
the clips, go to...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syvKOYiIOvs
for part one and...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahabyIXtHOE
for part two. If you like them, please click on the fifth star to keep the rating up.
It was nice to see Mike speak his mind and not be rushed through it. The interview helped
to confirm what a great leader he'd make. He makes sense. Keep up the good work in getting
the word out!
Submitted on April 21st, 2007 by georgesearlegiffin
I recently wrote to David Broder of the Washington Post in regard to his attrocious article
covering the Winter Meeting of the Democratic National Committee. He blew off Mike Gravel's
speech in a few words as though it was nothing but a piece of nonesense. I happened to tape
all the candidate speeches at this event and was outraged at David Broder's "take" on them.
Gravel gave an outstanding speech.
Many commented later that his was the most honest and inspiring delivery. We have to get a
real handle on the media's "filtering" process whereby they pretend there are only 2 to 3
candidates, not 9 or 10. They repeat adnogium "Hillary" this, and "Obama" that, "Hillary"
this, and "Obama" that. In doing so they fully endorse those candidates with corporate money
behind them, not the best candidates. There needs to be a major scientific study (a la Noam
Chomsky) of this abuse of getting information on all candidates to the public. There also
needs to be a stop to the attrocious exclusion of candidates at the Presidential Primaries.
The above abuses of journalism are NIGHTMARISH!!! This is how Democracies die !!!!!!!!
I am encouraged and motivated and directed to argue against quackery high-handed offensives of
sickening violation and sadism. I critically conscientiously resist impositional bossy
provocative disturbing demands to degrade health and dignity in the criminal quack vane of
tyrannical assailment and claims to power to take away rights. I hate aggressive evil quackery
like forced sickening poisoning druggings. There is no justification for medical fraud that
insists on ruining comforts and advantages of complimentary graces. Especially bad, I kick
against THE MOUNT SINAI JEWISH HOSPITALS freakish sadistic sickening quack association. Scott
"el unico" Baker
I'd just like to add my two cents here. I'm not an associate of any political party, but I do
hold the conviction and to the principle that everyone has the right to express their viewpoint
and opinion. I find it refreshing to hear Mike's views and if his views get others to think out
loud with others then he has served all of us well. Through dialogue and the clashing of
opinions one can hope that truth will prevail. Consultation vs confrontation - Let's all keep on
talking and seeking the truth for any given situation. Best regards, Brad
Two refreshing things happened to me recently - I read Daniel Ellsberg's "Secrets", a memoir
on the Pentagon Papers, and I caught Senator Gravel on the C-Span coverage of the Democratic
Winter Conference. I was very impressed with Senator Gravel, for his courage and honesty in
the Vietnam era, for his courage and hoensty about the current Iraq war, and for everything
else he said about our national psyche on a wide range of subjects I love it when someone
tells it like it is.
Senator Gravel - you are the candidate I have been looking for all these years. Please hang
in there; word will get around and you will become a force to reckon with. Please use the
internet, like Gov. Dean in the 2004 primaries, to get your message across. Even if you do
not get the Democratic nomination, please hang in there as an independent. I think a good
number of Republicans also will vote for you
I am disappointed by the Democratic contenders, especially Sen. Clinton, and her failure to
vote against the war. (Sen. Obama seems nice, but he is too green.) We need your life
experiences, your honesty, your courage, and your common sense.
I will vote for you if you stick to your message and do not bow down. I have also sent in
some money to your campaign. Not a whole lot, but a little each from a lot of us should work.
And please do not be soiled by those blasted corporations!!!
I like some of Mike Gavel's view points. However I would like to see his stand on some
rather important issues, such as: 1. Clean elections. 2. Third party candidates, (he would
probably fare better as an indepandent, or third party candidate). 3. Flat Rate Income Tax,
(a national sales tax would be too regressive to the poor and middle class; or what used to
be one. The first $30,000.00 would not be taxed.) 4. An Article V Constitutional convention.
5. President elected by popular vote. (eliminate the electoral college). 6. Change life time
tenure of federal judges to 12 years. (They could be re-appointed if their conduct on the
bench warrented it.) 7. Make voting mandatory. 8. Eliminate campaign funds from businesses
to any candidate. A business is not a person, so they can not claim freedom of speech
restrictions. 9. A citizen's initative. (Where laws can be passed or repealed by national
vote.)
Where does Senator Gavel stand on these issues? Will he take a stand in writing?
If so, he would make a great candidate and hopefully president.
Anyone elected by the current corporate elite duopoly will be just more of the same, no
matter the name.
I hope Senator Gavel is different.
“We the people” are the government, of the People, by
the people, and for the people, and are the “Deciders”. We have the power to restore
America to greatness and honor. You can help rescue our endangered democracy from the
political-corporate elite, through clean elections, a popular vote for president, a
strong third political party, and an Article V Constitutional convention. Learn
more at
www.helpchangeamerica.com
. Email:
bob@helpchangeamerica.com
Comments
Response to criticism against Abortion rights
Submitted on September 7th, 2007 by xawesomexelixwhadda ya know
Submitted on September 7th, 2007 by zoticus1Well,
I never thought I would vote again due to the severe degradation in our government, state and federal, but hey along comes someone I believe is a straight shooter, no nonsense and the like. Well there are some things I would like Mike to talk about, specifically our economy and how we need to think about the petrol dollar and its synthetic and unsustainable profits.What will we do?
Second I would like Mike to focus a bit more on Hispanic and Black issues and things such as the AIDS epidemic in our country. How we can become a leader and beacon for freedom and technology and at the same time become more considerate of our neighbors on this small planet.
The world is changing rapidly and people are starting to wake up and realize what they thought was reality was just a trashy novel; its sad to say but thank god W came along to help us see the reality that we have been lied to for so long. Thank god Mike came along to clean house! Peace
Push for National Int
Submitted on August 12th, 2007 by parisdI hope Gravel's campaign people are reading this. Right now is the absolute perfect time for them to turn up the heat and push the Nat'l Initiative, in light of the past horrible revision of the FISA court law that past this last weekend and all of the other hard efforts ignored by congress, that the people who have protest and campaigned for Dems who told us that there would be real change. This is the only thing that will save this country is by giving the power to the people to make laws for themselves and reduce congresses role to administrative. I hope his people jump on this opportunity.
Also on the Fair Tax, Gravel needs to point out a couple of things to make this issue clearer. One that the rebate he is proposing is a way to offset the tax liability of the 23% or what ever rate that would be used. Equal to in the income tax system the way a standard or items deductions offset tax liability that way, only the rebate checks come monthly to the tax payer since there would be no tax forms to submit.
Second Gravel should point out that there are 5 states that have a version of this in place where there is no state income tax, but a higher sales tax instead to raise revenue. Wash & NV are two that I can think of off the top of my head.
mike,you and dennis kucinich
Submitted on July 27th, 2007 by gingymike,
you and dennis kucinich seem to be the peace candidates. and way to the left. i am a leftie and i think we need a change to the left. what if the two of you ran together?
remember, bill clinton was the come back kid. you and dennis could be the new come back kids.
you ned more time on those debates.
good luck. hang in there. if tucker carlson doesn't like your views...you are doing something right. needless to say tucker does not think much of any liberals. i would love to see you face off on his show. you could really give it to him!
mary
I agree, I was actually
Submitted on August 18th, 2007 by Gravel4PresI agree, I was actually thinking the same thing. I think Gravel would fare better in the general election. So if Kucinich would step out of the primary race, with a public pledge by Gravel to pick him up on his ticket as VP. Gravel would witness a sharp rise in polls, which in turn would encourage more people to support him. Cause I believe there are alot of people out there that want to vote for Gravel, but they wont because they're stuck in this "top-tier/bottom-tier" mindset. If people had more confidence that he could win the race, they would flock behind him in the millions.
The Gravel, Kucinich camps should really be discussing this!
Gravel 2008 Chat Now Available at Campaigns Wikia !
Submitted on July 27th, 2007 by JaywinGravel 2008 chat (that is, #gravel2008) has been added to the dropdown menu at Campaigns Wikia CGI Gateway to IRC: http://irc.wikia.com/campaigns/
I'm not entirely positive, but I'm pretty sure you'll have to create a username there first. (It would take about 30 seconds!)
http://campaigns.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Userlogin
Regarding Moral Judgement
Submitted on July 22nd, 2007 by Brad G BurchMinimize Tension on the Abortion Issue: Reduce its Correlates
Submitted on July 22nd, 2007 by JaywinAs I see it, perhaps the best way to deal with the abortion issue is to examine the correlates of abortion and then target those correlations with effective policies. If those correlations can be dealt with effectively, then perhaps less women will even see abortion as a personal option. From what I've read, there are at least three significant correlations that can be made with women who get abortions:
1.) Women who tend to be young
2.) Women who tend to lack financial resources
3.) Women who tend to lack social support
If these three points are accurate, then focusing on these areas may be more productive on this issue.
Moral Judgements
Submitted on July 21st, 2007 by Brad G BurchMoral Legislation
Submitted on July 22nd, 2007 by Matt DyerWhy is abortion an issue that is difficult to grasp? I actually do understand why some pro-life people (I think both terms for the sides of the argument are bogus-it should just be for or against abortion-I'm pro-life and choice.) think the way they do, but I think it's misguided. Then again, I wouldn't really want to have a child I helped conceive be aborted-but I also understand it isn't my place-it's the woman's place, it is her body, and I don't believe that the embryo or fetus counts as sentient human being until it has a developed brain and nervous system-for until then it can not think or feel. And even when it does, I believe the woman's life, with a great deal of people who love and care for her, is more important-considering there is no suffering for the fetus. But, regardless of any of this-it is the woman's body and her choice to do as she chooses with it, as she is the adult, sentient human being without question-and the zygote is not the same as an infant child.
What gives the government the right to legislate morality? Homosexuality is a private matter that effects no one else and, as Gravel would agree with me on, falls under the right to the pursuit of happiness in the very documents this country was founded on. The abortion argument may hold some debate, but I don't see it with homosexuality-morally wrong or not, it hurts no one. Many people see religions opposed to their own (or the lack of a religion) as evil-but most would also see it as preposterous to suggest that the government stop people from practicing a religion or not practicing a religion in a country that is supposed to have freedom.
My view of morality, and I think Gravel's view is similar which is part of why I support the man, is that it is only truly wrong if it hurts someone other than the perpetrator of the act. If there is no victim, there should be no crime, so to speak. Moral judgment on the political level should be decided on grounds regarding personal liberties and the well being of the people-not what the decision maker views as wrong and right in a private situation. And to address your comment on a hedonistic way of life being accepted-why not? I'm not a hedonist myself-but why should someone who contributes to society otherwise not be allowed to live their life as they choose? I don't think hedonism falls in with either of the other "moral questions" (for lack of a better term), but it is a point nonetheless.
Don't mean to sound preachy or argumentative myself-just expressing ideas.
-Matt
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi
Morality & Freedom
Submitted on July 21st, 2007 by Jaywinrepublicans love Democratic issues
Submitted on July 19th, 2007 by ShaneGay Rights
Submitted on August 31st, 2007 by kabbalistguy1984A Wiki to "Meet Like Minds"
Submitted on July 14th, 2007 by JaywinMike Gravel supporters can get together at Campaigns Wikia to add and exchange information & ideas about the Gravel 2008 campaign. Editting is easy and ANYONE can use it! (This wiki uses the same software as Wikipedia, but it is not affiliated with Wikipedia)
Mike Gravel article: (Something you'd like to add? Go for it!)
http://campaigns.wikia.com/wiki/Mike_Gravel
A list of Gravel 2008 articles for every state!
http://campaigns.wikia.com/wiki/Mike_Gravel/Get_Local
Easily create links to Mike Gravel related information from all around the internet and have them in one place
Easily embed Images & YouTube videos
There's a Mike Gravel forum: http://campaigns.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Mike_Gravel
And so much more! The utility of this site is limited only by the imagination of its users! Hope to see you all there!
I would like to help but...
Submitted on July 11th, 2007 by phlashliteI recently saw online an ABC News interview with Senator Gravel and I was immediately moved. After it was over I thought to myself "I have just found my presidential candidate". I then found his web site so I could read more about where he stands, only to find he is pro-amnesty for illegal aliens... I was crestfallen. I wrote to Senator Gravel and explained that, as a lifelong Democrat, I have actually been having the unimaginable thought of possibly voting for a Republican candidate based on this issue.
If only Senator Gravel would change his position and support American citizens and legal residents instead of aiding border jumpers, I would contribute to his campaign and vote for him in a heartbeat. Is it possible for his supporters to urge him to change his position on this important issue and instead support American citizens rather than so many millions of people who have illegally invaded our country? That would make all the difference for me. He is a very powerful figure whose thinking is right on in so many other ways. I hope this message gets through to him.
wow
Submitted on September 7th, 2007 by zoticus1Are you afraid of losing your job or perhaps your afraid of "brown" people? Well if its the job issue you need not look any further for blame than your betters and Nafta among other things. And I would like to remind some about the campaign of fear Most politicians use to collect votes. The Mexicans are feeling the global effects of stupid economic policies and crooked politicians and this should be a gauge for the world as a whole and not as mechanisms of fear. America is also feeling the squeeze and so what do we do? Well lets get out torches and rope and look for a scapegoat! Mexicans? Sure!
Seriously though, I know there is a lot of"illegals" coming in but you cannot live in a walled society.Look at any walls in the past. And besides they are not the cause for your insecurities they are just an effect from a bigger cause.
Elites are bleeding us to death and we blame hard working people. Sad.
Peace and acceptance is what we need.
Trade is Key
Submitted on July 22nd, 2007 by blueyes20You'll never find the right candidate that way
Submitted on July 16th, 2007 by pattgavinIf you support a candidate based on one issue, you're likely to put someone in office who will do many things you don't like, but will possibly give you one thing in return. Is that worth it? There are a number of areas where I disagree with Mike, but looking at his record at large (the war in Iraq, the Fair Tax, National Ballot Initiatives, legalizing marijuana, stem cell research, gay marriage) I'm heavily leaning toward him.
The only way you'll find a candidate to support every issue the same way you do is if you run for office. Barring that, look at each candidate and see who agrees with you on most issues. That's your best candidate.
As far as writing to ask him to change his position, I'm 100% in favor of allowing people into this country to find a better life. That's how my family wound up here. My great-grandfather emigrated from Ireland, and from what I've been able to find out about him, it looks like he came first to Canada and then into this country, and I can't find one shred of evidence that he was legal. In fact, a great many people who are ancestors of Americans did not enter this country legally. I can't deny anyone the right to want a better life, just as my great-grandfather did.
I'm amazed that a nation that calls itself Christian would violate one of Jesus' teachings in this matter. Any Christian who feels that we shouldn't extend legalization to these people should spend some quality time with their Bibles, as they've missed some very important teachings.
I think the only people who have a right to deny access to others into this country are native Americans. Those who are the direct descendants of the people who lived here before the Europeans came. Everyone else came here for the same reasons that people continue to come here, and those people should be extended the same rights that we now enjoy because our ancestors did the same thing.
Agreed!
Submitted on August 30th, 2007 by kabbalistguy1984If you must support a candidate, it shouldn't be because of one exclusive thing. At the same time, you will not find a candidate who will 100% satisfy you. Look over the agenda of a potential candidate that you'll support and if you like him/her, then support that person.
Also, this country is not Christian. We like to think we are, but we're not.
You're correct in your last paragraph where you state that:
Submitted on July 19th, 2007 by Independent_Thinker>"I think the only people who have a right to deny access to others into this country are Native Americans. Those who are the direct descendants of the people who lived here before the Europeans came."<
I know they feel the same way, but the US government is still holding them hostage in many ways. But, that's a subject for another forum in another place and time. Nonetheless, if you knew what I do about the subject you would see what I mean. ;)
HOWEVER, back on topic, I believe that the term "Illegal Immigration" is an oxymoron. A person who is here illegally is an 'illegal ALIEN'. An Immigrant is a person who has Immigrated here LEGALLY!!!
I believe that it's fine if someone wants to Immigate here LEGALLY!!! I believe Illegal Aliens should either be sent back to where they came from (and the bill paid by their governments) and made to Immigrate LEGALLY if they want to be here so bad - OR - if a particular individual situation warrants it, they be allowed Asylum until they DO get LEGAL ....QUICKLY!!! But there had darned well be an exceedingly GOOD REASON for the granting of Asylum!!!!!
I guess you have a selective memory of what Ellis Island was all about OR you simply weren't taught about it in History Class. Learn about it here: http://library.thinkquest.org/20619/Eihist.html
United We Stand - Divided We Fall
Immigrant-candidates invited to forum in Indian Country
Submitted on August 3rd, 2007 by Mike and Lori"But, that's a subject for another forum in another place and time."
That forum is Prez on the Rez: "a historic forum that will assemble Democratic presidential candidates together on Indian land for the first time in American Indian history." August 23, 2007.
Clinton has refused to show up. Obama and Edwards haven't agreed to be there either. That leaves only the real candidates, the ones with serious ideas. Its about time they pared these forums down to the serious candidates, they're just trivializing it....
http://www.prezontherez.org/
Today on TV
Submitted on July 8th, 2007 by steferisThis morning, I watched Senator Gravel in the interview with George Stephanopolis. I am impressed to find someone who thinks like I do. I live in a State where the majority is still Republican even though some places are strongly Democratic. I would love to see a woman or a black person as President, but I cannot agree with what they are expousing. This country is in deep trouble on all fronts and we are not making changes. Senator Gravel was a breath of fresh air. What do millions of dollars have to do with governing a country? These are our millions of dollars going for ads that mean nothing. When did it start to matter how rich you were instead of how intelligent and committed to this country and the rest of the world you were? It should not matter. Each adult citizen of this country should have a vote, exercise that vote and directly elect our leaders, maybe then, our leaders would have to respond to the will of the people.
AMEN!!!
Submitted on July 19th, 2007 by Independent_Thinker>"Each adult citizen of this country should have a vote, exercise that vote and directly elect our leaders, maybe then, our leaders would have to respond to the will of the people."<
Key words there that I Bolded and Underlined. The Electoral College is obsolete. It served it's function in a time when it was needed. But, today, it only serves as a way to get around the DIRECT ELECTION OF OUR LEADERS by US - We The People.
United We Stand - Divided We Fall
Mike Gravel has my vote!
Submitted on July 8th, 2007 by BobLevinBob Levin -- Former US Intelligence Professional
The Monkey's Garden, Manifesto "tm"
http://home.comcast.net/~themonkeysgarden/TheMonkeysGardenManifesto.html
Current Issue:
http://home.comcast.net/~themonkeysgarden/TMGMJuly2007.PDF
The restoration of America requires that we are provided with real leaders who believe in the buttressing principles of our constitutional democracy. Mike Gravel (D) has my vote and complete support in his bid for the U.S. Presidency in 2008. The mainstream media continues to work against Mike Gravel, because they know he cannot be bought-off and will re-empower the people as the government of the United States of America. Mike Gravel and America require our assistance as citizens and human brothers and sisters. Please visit Mike Gravel for President 2008 (www.gravel2008.us), read the content, sign the petition to have Mike Gravel’s name listed on your state’s ballot, volunteer, and donate whatever you can afford. Mike Gravel is the only Democratic Party candidate who truly offers us the kind of change that recognizes the human being in all people.
Americans should take their messages to the streets, even if that means standing alone for an hour with your homemade sign and/or talking with other human beings about the crimes of this treasonous administration.
Vote out of office any politician who refuses to affirm the impeachment or indictment of the continuing criminal enterprise that I have identified as the Bush bin Laden Crime Syndicate; complicit coconspirators in the terrorist attacks against the United States of America on 911.
Ask the other candidates seeking the presidency in 2008, if they support publicly funded elections and the elimination of corporatist contamination.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or if I may be of some service to you.
Standing for the Human Beings;
Bob Levin, Beaverton, Oregon USA
Re: The program about the Pentagon Papers
Submitted on July 12th, 2007 by Brad G BurchIncome Tax/Sales Tax
Submitted on June 29th, 2007 by fresheroneCongratulations on having the courage to take the "un-Democratic" position of suggesting a sales tax to replace the income tax. We Democrats should realize that the nation wastes too much time and money on income tax collection and avoidance and we let millionaires regularly off the hook because of tax shelters and smart attorneys that the average person does not have access to.
The national sales tax can be made no more regressive than income taxes. In Calif. we exempt many items (all food) from sales taxes. Congress could spend their time "fine-tuning" what the sales tax applies to from year to year according to needs of the economy instead of sitting around passing unecessary legislation. The downside is all of the tax people and lawyers who will have to find another line of work.
An income tax is a tax on productivity. It just doesn't make sense. If you are not going to spend money, that's your option and a tax shouldn't be collected until somebody does spend it.
Bob M.
Carpinteria, CA
Mike interviewed by Shuster
Submitted on June 27th, 2007 by psammiProbably a bit old, but I just saw an interview where David Schuster had Mike on to talk about the "rock" video. I thought I liked Schuster, at least a bit, but my god, the condecension in his voice was terrible! He says "oh, so it took you THREE takes to throw a rock into a lake? You're a nice man, but . . ." I mean, what kind of question is that? This angers me in a lot of ways. A former senator, filibustered against the draft, instrumental in the pentagon papers, what exactly are Shuster's accomplishments? It doesn't mean that Shuster has to cowtow or anything, but a little decency or intelligent discourse please? "I hope your next video will be about Iraq." ?!?!? There doesn't even seem to be a modicum of respect or evenhandedness left among the "talking heads" or main "news" programs.
-Tony
Addiction Recovery Reform
Submitted on June 26th, 2007 by tabranriAngela Abbott
Hi, I'm Angela,
I'm a film student and am working on a documentary. I am seeking to get some questions answered. I realize that a lot of the questions that I'm about to ask you are questions that you may not be able to answer but if you have someone in government that you can refer me to it would be great. I'm just trying to gather information to be put together for a documentary called One Love Addiction© in an effort to improve addiction recovery. Thank you for your time.
Here are the questions:
1. How much money was received in 2005 & 2006, from asset seizures in drug related crime arrests in the United States ?
2. Why is media allowed to market depression and other illnesses to advertise legal drugs on national television. i.e. commercials that sell anti depressants and other drugs therefore encouraging the public to resort to drugs as a false sense of well-being?
3. What procedure took place to outlaw the television media from advertising the sale of tobacco sales?
4. Can we implement these procedures to outlaw the advertisement of Alcohol and other legal drug sales on national television?
5. What is the difference between legal and illegal drug sales?
6. What is the difference between legal and illegal drug use?
7. Why is it that when a towns economy gets very poor, the drug stores flourish?
8. Why is it that when a towns economy gets very poor, the drug related crimes escalate?
9. If everyone stopped illegal drug use, smoking and drinking alcohol and resorted to natural health care tomorrow, what would that do to our governments economy?
10. How much does our system rely on drug addicts and people staying sick?
11. Why are there so many strict laws that limit the practice of natural health care?
12. Did you know that, based on Alcoholics Anonymous World Services' own statistics, Alcoholics Anonymous has only a 5% retention rate and therefore is at a 95% failure? Given these facts why is the government funding programs based on the 12 steps?
Gravel in NY
Submitted on June 25th, 2007 by psammiMike,
A group of young professionals here in New York City support your stances and your candidacy! Please let us know how we can help!
Best,
Tony
sudden interest.
Submitted on June 18th, 2007 by Audaxive never been involved with politics much and it is not my area of interest. i like chemistry and physical sciences but it just seems like those who go into politics as a career are slowly ruining the country. supporting Mike Gravel seems like it could possibly be the most important thing i can do, ever for the future of the country.
All i want is the truth, why is it so hard to find?
Demanding U.S. Media Reform Now
Submitted on June 12th, 2007 by georgesearlegiffinDemanding U.S. Media Reform Now
press conference or joint-resourced media time purchase which would bring some of our best minds together in a panel to demand an abrupt alteration of "media campaign coverage as usual". Picture these folks on one stage: Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, Bill Moyers, Ralph Nader and Noam Chomsky !! Maybe this should include a call for massively boycotting major media news outlets that self-appoint themselves to "tier" and "filter" who gets air time.
Demands: a) bury all use of "TIER" when refering to candidates. All this does is
signal which ones are bought by big money. b) Remove debates from control of Political Parties and from Media. We could return to League of Women Voters, or some group who fundamentally UNDERSTANDS the priority of fairness for ALL U.S. Primary & Presidential Debates; c). pull licenses of any network which claims news credentials, yet regularly excludes and "filters-out"
legitimate candidates who have profound messages and skills. While we're at this business of reforming U.S. Media, how about if we finally get down to demanding inclusion of more than two political parties. There is no precedent in U.S. documents which picks this magic number, We need to end the two-party monopoly on the debate and governing process. Actually, it's not so bad to
how?
Submitted on June 18th, 2007 by Audaxhow can we possibly tackle this issue. the only way average people catch on to issues is when it gets pounded out in the media and they sure as hell arent going to cover anything like this.
I'm working for Mike
Submitted on May 24th, 2007 by rerailerI support Gravel
Submitted on May 21st, 2007 by HougieBeth Houghland
What a concept!! A candidate that actually thinks like most Americans and has the courage to say so. I have always considered myself a conservative democrat. I want common sense laws and leglislation. I feel that Mike Gravel offers this. I just sent a donation to his campaign. It wasn't much because my husband's job is ending in September. It is being shipped to Mexico. Come on folks if I can find the money to contribute so can everyone who agrees with him. Just think. if everyone sent the money that they would spend for taking their family to the movies one time amd donate it to his campaign it would give him a chance to level the playing field with Clinton and Obama.
Thank you!
Submitted on April 27th, 2007 by jon4tesslerThanks, Senator Gravel for your wonderful, brave stance in last night's debate. Your candor, thoughtful comments and honesty certainly places you head and shoulders above all of the other candidates.
Just HOW did THEY get there anyway?
:)
Welcome back, Mike.
Submitted on April 27th, 2007 by Packy89Dear Mike,
It's good to see that you haven't faded away, and that you are still fighting the good fight.
I've never forgotten the days when you would frequently visit the Malone Surveying office in Kenai, and the issues of the day were hotly debated by you, my brother, and father. l admired your stance on the Vietnam War.
Both my dad and brother are gone, but what they taught me endures. I'm hoping that for a change, someone with real ideas, real ideals, and real courage can make a difference.
I know that it's difficult to compete with political strumpets who can raise a half-million dollars at a sit-down dinner and can buy all the TV time the want, but I'm glad you're giving it a shot. I've sent a small contribution to assist.
Welcome back. If nothing else, you can help keep the bastards honest.
Still a friend,
Patrick Malone
Kenai, Alaska
thank you
Submitted on April 27th, 2007 by common terryyou were awesome mike!
you won the debate.
too bad they banned applause!
my only question, why didnt you raise your hand in support of kucinich impeaching cheney? that man is a war criminal. bush will be next.
From a Soldier in Iraq...
Submitted on April 27th, 2007 by eleonaiMore than hope - the audacity to act
Submitted on April 27th, 2007 by IrenePDear Senator Mike Gravel,
I am overseas (not in the military) and will be returning home soon. I watched in despair during the last election as all Democratic candidates refused to take a position on anything and I questioned if my vote would even be counted. It was in this context that I was taken completely by surprise by Barack Obama's keynote address in 2004. My eyes pricked with tears and goosebumps made my hair stand on end as I began to believe that there was hope for change in this country.
But hope does not make change and the time has passed for pretty words. It is with someone who is willing to act that makes change. Senator Gravel's contribution to the debate yesterday (thankfully available online) is evidence that he is willing to speak without rehearsal and rhetoric because he has a plan of action. He didn't need to speak about his upbringing, invent a young child's story to draw upon for sympathy, gloss over difficult questions with measured fence sitting or minimize the impact of his past public work. He helped the country to end the Vietnam years and I'm confident he will act again to end this war. His tax plan, history of action for the environment and willingness to change the all too sacred Constitution will help save the country. To all those naysayers who would dismiss him because he doesn't have the "finesse" for foreign diplomacy - The world will be thankful to voters if the US has TRANSPARENT, CONSISTENT and CLEAR policy.
Thank you so much Senator Gravel! Tell it to 'em straight - everyone deserves it!
Sincerely,
Irene
Watch Mike Gavel
Submitted on April 27th, 2007 by phewi<>Watch a clip of Mike's awesome style at the Democratic debate 4-26-07
http://www.msnbc.com/id/18300340
Good show
Submitted on April 27th, 2007 by netheadTax Reform
Submitted on April 24th, 2007 by georgesearlegiffinAn important word on tax reform. Every American needs to see, and every candidate needs to address the highly-organized documentation about the U.S. Income Tax fraud in Aaron Russo's excellent film entitled" "America - Freedom To Fascism". You can access it via Google, and via: www.freedomtofascism.com
Any candidate for president who is serious about tax reform needs to press for a full shut down of an illegal IRS, and an illegal Federal Reserve Sytem.
See the above mentioned movie, then respond?
Just before the American Revolution, Americans had just "had it" with taxes that totaled 10% of their income. Now illegal burden has risen to 30,40 & 50% of our incomes. It's time for FULL REFORM.
The Progressive Gap
Submitted on April 24th, 2007 by alexKatrina Vanden Heuvel writes that Senator Bernie Sanders thinks the electorate is far ahead of Congress on economy, war and global warming.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut?bid=7&pid=188192
Gravel 08
The Corporate Media
Submitted on April 23rd, 2007 by Reed in VtHello,
Mike Gravel recently stopped by Vermont to hold a forum in Brattleboro. The telephone number in the paper turned out to be where Sen. Gravel was staying...to make a long story short, I was granted an interview for our local public access station. This interview turned out to be the first in a series of shows that I will be airing called "Corporate Free Media". I will also be trying to distribute this to other public access stations to air. I've chopped the interview into segments for uploading to youtube. While I'm a rookie at this, I think Mr. Gravel looks and sounds terrific. I'll have more segments to add later, I have two up so far, but my regular job of running heavy equipment for a highway dept. takes up much time. To view the clips, go to...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syvKOYiIOvs
for part one and...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahabyIXtHOE
for part two. If you like them, please click on the fifth star to keep the rating up.
nice interview!
Submitted on July 10th, 2007 by emiyamauchiHey Reed,
It was nice to see Mike speak his mind and not be rushed through it. The interview helped to confirm what a great leader he'd make. He makes sense. Keep up the good work in getting the word out!
Emi
Stopping Media's "Filtering" Process
Submitted on April 21st, 2007 by georgesearlegiffinI recently wrote to David Broder of the Washington Post in regard to his attrocious article covering the Winter Meeting of the Democratic National Committee. He blew off Mike Gravel's speech in a few words as though it was nothing but a piece of nonesense. I happened to tape all the candidate speeches at this event and was outraged at David Broder's "take" on them. Gravel gave an outstanding speech.
Many commented later that his was the most honest and inspiring delivery. We have to get a real handle on the media's "filtering" process whereby they pretend there are only 2 to 3 candidates, not 9 or 10. They repeat adnogium "Hillary" this, and "Obama" that, "Hillary" this, and "Obama" that. In doing so they fully endorse those candidates with corporate money behind them, not the best candidates. There needs to be a major scientific study (a la Noam Chomsky) of this abuse of getting information on all candidates to the public. There also needs to be a stop to the attrocious exclusion of candidates at the Presidential Primaries. The above abuses of journalism are NIGHTMARISH!!! This is how Democracies die !!!!!!!!
This ANTIQUACKERY ANTINAZI International Campaign is Exciting!
Submitted on March 30th, 2007 by scobak224Different Voices
Submitted on July 10th, 2007 by Brad G BurchWe need you Senator Gravel
Submitted on March 18th, 2007 by mchallaMurty Challa (mchalla00@yahoo.com)
Two refreshing things happened to me recently - I read Daniel Ellsberg's "Secrets", a memoir on the Pentagon Papers, and I caught Senator Gravel on the C-Span coverage of the Democratic Winter Conference. I was very impressed with Senator Gravel, for his courage and honesty in the Vietnam era, for his courage and hoensty about the current Iraq war, and for everything else he said about our national psyche on a wide range of subjects I love it when someone tells it like it is.
Senator Gravel - you are the candidate I have been looking for all these years. Please hang in there; word will get around and you will become a force to reckon with. Please use the internet, like Gov. Dean in the 2004 primaries, to get your message across. Even if you do not get the Democratic nomination, please hang in there as an independent. I think a good number of Republicans also will vote for you
I am disappointed by the Democratic contenders, especially Sen. Clinton, and her failure to vote against the war. (Sen. Obama seems nice, but he is too green.) We need your life experiences, your honesty, your courage, and your common sense.
I will vote for you if you stick to your message and do not bow down. I have also sent in some money to your campaign. Not a whole lot, but a little each from a lot of us should work. And please do not be soiled by those blasted corporations!!!
Thanks!
Senator Gravel
Submitted on March 31st, 2007 by rwfwheelerI like some of Mike Gavel's view points. However I would like to see his stand on some rather important issues, such as: 1. Clean elections. 2. Third party candidates, (he would probably fare better as an indepandent, or third party candidate). 3. Flat Rate Income Tax, (a national sales tax would be too regressive to the poor and middle class; or what used to be one. The first $30,000.00 would not be taxed.) 4. An Article V Constitutional convention. 5. President elected by popular vote. (eliminate the electoral college). 6. Change life time tenure of federal judges to 12 years. (They could be re-appointed if their conduct on the bench warrented it.) 7. Make voting mandatory. 8. Eliminate campaign funds from businesses to any candidate. A business is not a person, so they can not claim freedom of speech restrictions. 9. A citizen's initative. (Where laws can be passed or repealed by national vote.)
Where does Senator Gavel stand on these issues? Will he take a stand in writing?
If so, he would make a great candidate and hopefully president.
Anyone elected by the current corporate elite duopoly will be just more of the same, no matter the name.
I hope Senator Gavel is different.
“We the people” are the government, of the People,
by the people, and for the people, and are the “Deciders”.
We have the power to restore America to greatness and honor.
You can help rescue our endangered democracy from the political-corporate elite,
through clean elections, a popular vote for president, a strong
third political party, and an Article V Constitutional convention.
Learn more at www.helpchangeamerica.com .
Email: bob@helpchangeamerica.com